Epictetus' dichotomy of control, explained through an exam that goes wrong
Nora hasn't slept well for three nights. The exam is already done, but she can't stop going over it: if it doesn't go well, she won't reach the average grade; if she doesn't reach the average grade, she won't be able to choose the degree she wants. Her friend Diego tries to help with a phrase he has heard in some video: "It no longer depends on you, so stop worrying about it."
Nora's response is indignation: "Then why did I kill myself studying?"
This scene opens one of the chapters of Talks on a Park Bench, and it is the best starting point for understanding the most quoted idea of Stoicism, because it contains the most common mistake in interpreting it.
What Epictetus actually said
Epictetus opens his Enchiridion (in Greek, "pocket manual", something designed to carry with you and consult often) with a distinction:
- Up to us are our judgments, our impulses, our desires and our aversions. That is, what arises from our own will.
- Not up to us are the body, possessions, reputation or office. That is, everything subject to external circumstances, other people or chance.
This is what we know today as the dichotomy of control. And Epictetus sums it up in a sentence that is still uncomfortable two thousand years later: it is not things that disturb us, but the judgment we make about them.
Diego's mistake (and almost everyone's)
"It's not up to you" does not mean "it doesn't matter". Nor does it mean "it doesn't matter how hard you worked".
Epictetus never said you should stop making an effort because the result is not up to us. He said something more demanding: put all your effort into the part that is up to you and, only afterward, let go of the anxiety about the result.
Applied to Nora's case: studying, preparing and showing up to the exam with the utmost care was the part that was up to her, and she has already done it. That effort doesn't become useless because the grade is no longer in her hands. The only thing that is left over now is the anguish over something that can no longer be touched.
When the phrase is used to justify not showing up to something "just in case" or not fighting for a just cause "because the result isn't up to me", it stops being Stoicism. In the words of the book, it is "resignation with very good marketing".
Why this idea still works today
The dichotomy of control hasn't stayed in ancient philosophy books. Modern psychology works with a very similar idea, the locus of control: people who clearly distinguish what depends on them and what doesn't tend to manage anxiety better than those who believe everything depends on their effort or their fault.
And few things test that distinction as much as social media. The reach of a post is decided by an algorithm you don't control. Whether someone answers your message depends on another person's mood or interest. Living waiting on all of that as if it depended on you is not making more effort: it is wearing yourself out.
An important nuance: not everything that is "not up to you" is inevitable
Sometimes, what is not up to you is not a neutral fact, like the weather, but an unfair limitation that someone else has imposed on you. Calmly accepting that you don't control the weather is not the same as simply accepting an arbitrary rule as if it were a natural limit.
The dichotomy of control is a powerful tool. Like all tools, it can also be misused, even against you.
Four exercises to practice it
Each chapter of Talks on a Park Bench ends with a toolbox. These are the exercises from the chapter dedicated to Epictetus:
- The two-column list. Choose a problem that worries you right now. In one column, write what is up to you; in the other, what is not. You will probably find things placed in the wrong column.
- The nightly review. For one week, before going to sleep, think about something that worried you that day and ask yourself: did it really depend on me?
- The rescue phrase. Choose a short phrase, such as "I did what I could, the rest isn't mine", and repeat it when you notice you are starting to go over something again and again. You don't have to believe it the first time: repetition makes it true over time.
- The one-week experiment. Apply the two-column question to a single recurring worry for seven days and note whether you notice any difference.
Beyond the T-shirt slogan
Epictetus wasn't talking about controlling your schedule or your study habits. He was born a slave, lived lame because of his master's cruelty and spoke of something much more serious: how to keep your dignity in a life you hadn't chosen. Knowing that story completely changes how you read his sayings. We tell it in what Instagram doesn't tell you about Stoicism.
Talks on a Park Bench, by philosophy teacher María Ferrer Tarazona, follows Marc, Nora, Diego and Vera as they stumble, without looking for it, upon the same questions philosophers have been asking themselves for more than two thousand years. With practical exercises at the end of each chapter, it is a read designed for young people and also for the classroom.
Save
